Re: [PATCH V2 12/15] perf tools: allow non-matching sample types

[Adrian Hunter]

On 01/07/13 22:10, Stephane Eranian wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 8:53 PM, David Ahern <dsahern@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> On 7/1/13 3:32 AM, Adrian Hunter wrote:
>>>
>>> Snip
>>>
>>>>
>>>> While this works for a combined S/W and tracepoint events session, I do not
>>>> like promoting sample types to the minimum compatible level for all events
>>>> in the session. perf needs to allow each event to have its own sample_type
>>>> and not force a minimal compatibility.
>>>
>>>
>>> Why?  The impact is small. The kernel API is completely unchanged.
>>
>>
>> I'd like to see libperf become a stable, usable library - usable by more than the perf binary and its builtin commands. I have already done this once for a daemon, and it was a PITA to get the specific use functional without memory leaks/growth in the libperf part.
>>
>> With respect to this specific patch it means appropriate flexibility in the data collected for events. ie., each event can have its own sample_type. For example if the tracepoint already contains task information TID is not needed - and IP may not be wanted either. The code processing the samples should not require all events to have some minimum data format - that just wastes buffer space.
>>
> I agree. This kernel needs to allow for any bit combination on
> sample_type and yet provide enough info
> to parse the buffer in the case of multi-event sampling. This is
> kernel bug. Tools should not have to handle
> this. Because it'd have to be repeated for each tool.
> 
> Later this week, I'll post a patch that address the kernel limitation.

But isn't it trivial.  Just add a new sample type that puts the ID first.
Anyone using the new PERF_SAMPLE_IDENTIFIER gets the new ABI.



diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h b/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h
index 0b1df41..6bb217e 100644
--- a/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h
@@ -134,8 +134,9 @@ enum perf_event_sample_format {
 	PERF_SAMPLE_STACK_USER			= 1U << 13,
 	PERF_SAMPLE_WEIGHT			= 1U << 14,
 	PERF_SAMPLE_DATA_SRC			= 1U << 15,
+	PERF_SAMPLE_IDENTIFIER			= 1U << 16,
 
-	PERF_SAMPLE_MAX = 1U << 16,		/* non-ABI */
+	PERF_SAMPLE_MAX = 1U << 17,		/* non-ABI */
 };
 
 /*
diff --git a/kernel/events/core.c b/kernel/events/core.c
index 1db3af9..a3707af 100644
--- a/kernel/events/core.c
+++ b/kernel/events/core.c
@@ -1203,6 +1203,9 @@ static void perf_event__id_header_size(struct perf_event *event)
 	if (sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_TIME)
 		size += sizeof(data->time);
 
+	if (sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_IDENTIFIER)
+		size += sizeof(data->id);
+
 	if (sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_ID)
 		size += sizeof(data->id);
 
@@ -4229,7 +4232,7 @@ static void __perf_event_header__init_id(struct perf_event_header *header,
 	if (sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_TIME)
 		data->time = perf_clock();
 
-	if (sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_ID)
+	if (sample_type & (PERF_SAMPLE_ID | PERF_SAMPLE_IDENTIFIER))
 		data->id = primary_event_id(event);
 
 	if (sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_STREAM_ID)
@@ -4268,6 +4271,9 @@ static void __perf_event__output_id_sample(struct perf_output_handle *handle,
 
 	if (sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_CPU)
 		perf_output_put(handle, data->cpu_entry);
+
+	if (sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_IDENTIFER)
+		perf_output_put(handle, data->id);
 }
 
 void perf_event__output_id_sample(struct perf_event *event,
@@ -4380,6 +4386,9 @@ void perf_output_sample(struct perf_output_handle *handle,
 
 	perf_output_put(handle, *header);
 
+	if (sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_IDENTIFIER)
+		perf_output_put(handle, data->id);
+
 	if (sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_IP)
 		perf_output_put(handle, data->ip);
 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/