Re: [PATCH] x86: Use asm-goto to implement mutex fast path on x86-64

[Borislav Petkov]

On Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 03:35:47PM -0700, Wedson Almeida Filho wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 3:28 PM, Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > perf stat --repeat 10 -a --sync --pre 'make -s clean; echo 1 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches' make -s -j64 bzImage
> 
> How many CPUs do you have in your system? Maybe -j64 vs -jNUM_CPUs
> affects your measurements as well.

8. But that shouldn't matter since I made the non-differing measurements two
mails back with -j64.

Also -j9, i.e. -j$(($NUM_CPUS+1)) gives "121.613217871 seconds time
elapsed" because with -j9 the probability of some core not executing a
make thread for whatever reason is higher than with -j64. But it is only
as high as an additional 1s with this workload.

I think with -j64 Ingo meant to saturate the scheduler to make sure
there always are runnable threads more than cores available so that we
can maximize the core utilization with threads running our workload.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine.
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/