On 28/06/13 20:19, David Ahern wrote:On 6/28/13 2:43 AM, Adrian Hunter wrote:The list_head is on the stack, so just free the rest of the list.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@xxxxxxxxx>
---
tools/perf/util/parse-events.c | 7 ++++++-
tools/perf/util/parse-events.h | 1 +
tools/perf/util/pmu.c | 2 +-
3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/parse-events.c b/tools/perf/util/parse-events.c
index 995fc25..d9cb055 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/parse-events.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/parse-events.c
@@ -1231,12 +1231,17 @@ int parse_events_term__clone(struct
parse_events_term **new,
term->val.str, term->val.num);
}
-void parse_events__free_terms(struct list_head *terms)
+void parse_events__free_terms_only(struct list_head *terms)
{
struct parse_events_term *term, *h;
list_for_each_entry_safe(term, h, terms, list)
free(term);
+}
+
+void parse_events__free_terms(struct list_head *terms)
+{
+ parse_events__free_terms_only(terms);
free(terms);
}
I still don't understand the reasoning for an _only function. There is only
1 place that mallocs the list_head and that 1 user should free its own
memory. All of the other users pass a stack variable.
No. See parse-events.y
The list head is defined as a pointer in the YYTYPE stack element:
%union
{
char *str;
u64 num;
struct list_head *head;
struct parse_events_term *term;
}
It is malloc'ed when terms are created:
event_term
{
struct list_head *head = malloc(sizeof(*head));
struct parse_events_term *term = $1;
ABORT_ON(!head);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(head);
list_add_tail(&term->list, head);
$$ = head;
}