Re: Re: [PATCH] tracing/kprobe: Recover old array if fails toenable kprobe

[Masami Hiramatsu]

(2013/06/29 3:43), Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> On 06/28, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, 2013-06-28 at 16:27 +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>>>
>>> Ah, but this conflicts with the other changes I sent. They have
>>> your acks, and iiuc Steven is going to apply them.
>>
>> I'll see if I can solve any conflicts. I need to get my -rt versions out
>> and start on the new 3.6 stable today. Then after that, I plan on going
>> though and getting all the tracing patches settled.
> 
> Thanks!
> 
>>> Besides, this fix is not complete afaics, we should also clear
>>> TP_FLAG_TRACE/PROFILE if __enable_trace_probe() fails.
> 
> Yes.
> 
> And I forgot to mention, until we fix the races we discuss in another
> thread, this WARN_ON() doesn't look right. So perhaps it would be
> really better to delay this change a bit.

Agreed, this fix is not a critical one. The racing problem of
dynamic events is what we have to solve at first.

Thank you!

-- 
Masami HIRAMATSU
IT Management Research Dept. Linux Technology Center
Hitachi, Ltd., Yokohama Research Laboratory
E-mail: masami.hiramatsu.pt@xxxxxxxxxxx


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/