Re: [PATCH RFC nohz_full 0/8] Provide infrastructure for full-systemidle

[Peter Zijlstra]

On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 03:24:42PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> Just to make sure I understand...  You are saying that it is OK for
> NO_HZ_FULL to shut down timekeeping if all CPUs are idle, even if some
> of them are taking NMIs from time to time, right?

Yeah.. its what we currently do and I don't see any reason to have
NO_HZ_FULL behave differently there.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/