Re: [PATCH 25/32] cpufreq: delete __cpuinit usage from all cpufreqfiles

From: Joe Perches
Date: Tue Jun 25 2013 - 00:15:31 EST


On Tue, 2013-06-25 at 09:01 +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 25 June 2013 01:00, Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
[]
> > -static int __cpuinit cpufreq_cpu_callback(struct notifier_block *nfb,
> > - unsigned long action, void *hcpu)
> > +static int cpufreq_cpu_callback(struct notifier_block *nfb,
> > + unsigned long action, void *hcpu)
>
> You were not required to change second line here and also don't
> change its indentation level. Check this everywhere.

Paul, yes, thanks for doing that here,
but please, do it everywhere...

;)

> > diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_stats.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_stats.c
[]
> > @@ -306,7 +306,7 @@ static int cpufreq_stat_notifier_policy(struct notifier_block *nb,
> > }
> >
> > static int cpufreq_stat_notifier_trans(struct notifier_block *nb,
> > - unsigned long val, void *data)
> > + unsigned long val, void *data)
>
> See.. unnecessary change.

Or from another perspective, ideal change.

> > -static int __cpuinit cpufreq_stat_cpu_callback(struct notifier_block *nfb,
> > +static int cpufreq_stat_cpu_callback(struct notifier_block *nfb,
> > unsigned long action,
> > void *hcpu)

Hey Paul, you missed some too.

Viresh, there's no absolute "right" way to do this.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/