Re: [PATCH 13/13] cpufreq: make sure frequency transitions are serialized

From: Rafael J. Wysocki
Date: Mon Jun 24 2013 - 09:24:19 EST


On Monday, June 24, 2013 06:46:39 PM Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 24 June 2013 18:53, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> > You can do
> >
> > if (WARN(transition_ongoing, "<text>"))
> > return;
> >
> > and below analogously.
>
> Ahh.. stupid code.. Check if this fixup is fine (attached too)

Looks OK, but since transition_ongoing is either 0 or 1 now, as far as I can
say, it would be better to make it a bool and use = true/false instead of
++/-- I suppose.

Thanks,
Rafael


> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> index 6624694..6ca7eac 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> @@ -267,10 +267,9 @@ void __cpufreq_notify_transition(struct
> cpufreq_policy *policy,
> switch (state) {
>
> case CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE:
> - if (transition_ongoing) {
> - WARN(1, "In middle of another frequency transition\n");
> + if (WARN(transition_ongoing,
> + "In middle of another frequency transition\n"))
> return;
> - }
>
> transition_ongoing++;
>
> @@ -293,10 +292,9 @@ void __cpufreq_notify_transition(struct
> cpufreq_policy *policy,
> break;
>
> case CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE:
> - if (!transition_ongoing) {
> - WARN(1, "No frequency transition in progress\n");
> + if (WARN(!transition_ongoing,
> + "No frequency transition in progress\n"))
> return;
> - }
>
> transition_ongoing--;
--
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/