Re: [PATCH 1/1] net: add dm9620 net usb driver

[Peter Korsgaard]

>>>>> "Joseph" == Joseph CHANG <josright123@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

 Joseph> DM9620 is an USB2.0 network adapter rather than DM9601 USB1.1. This
 Joseph> driver processed the RX data 4 bytes header, TX data 2 bytes header,
 Joseph> make the control bit exactly right in PHY write function, and optional
 Joseph> IFF_ALLMUTLI bit for RX control.

But dm9601.c already supports the dm9620 based devices. Why another
driver for the same hardware?

Please CC me on dm9601 related patches.

 Joseph> Tested good for many platforms, include X86 desktop and ARM embedded.

 Joseph> +static struct usb_driver dm9620_driver = {
 Joseph> +	.name = "dm9620",
 Joseph> +	.id_table = products,
 Joseph> +	.probe = usbnet_probe,
 Joseph> +	.disconnect = usbnet_disconnect,
 Joseph> +	.suspend = usbnet_suspend,
 Joseph> +	.resume = usbnet_resume,
 Joseph> +	.disable_hub_initiated_lpm = 1,
 Joseph> +};
 Joseph> +
 Joseph> +module_usb_driver(dm9620_driver);
 Joseph> +
 Joseph> +MODULE_AUTHOR("Peter Korsgaard <jacmet@xxxxxxxxxx>");

I'm not the author of this file.


-- 
Bye, Peter Korsgaard
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/