Re: [PATCHv v3] power: Include additional information inpm_print_times

[Joe Perches]

On Sat, 2013-06-22 at 21:52 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Friday, June 21, 2013 07:27:22 PM Joe Perches wrote:
> > On Sat, 2013-06-22 at 02:24 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > Namely, there are tools that use these messages to create suspend/resume time
> > > charts and they will stop working after the proposed changes.
> > 
> > dmesg output isn't guaranteed to be stable.
> 
> So?

So even if new information was only appended to
the existing line, the script could break.

If any script needs something stable it should
depend on information available through other
sources like trace or proc or sysfs.

Tools that use dmesg should adapt to whatever gets
thrown at it and handle the output from whatever
kernel versions the script supports.

For instance, what happens to the script when
console_level is set to 1?

Requiring that no one can change a dmesg to
add or improve the content for readability
or intelligibility I think unreasonable.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/