Re: [RFC PATCH] regulator: core: allow consumers to request tocloses step voltage

[Mark Brown]

On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 07:43:55AM -0500, Nishanth Menon wrote:
> On 10:51-20130621, Mark Brown wrote:

> > No, the consumer really doesn't want to be aware of linear step
> > regulators.  Why would it care that there even are linear steps?  If
> > the consumer is doing this based on the properties of the regulator
> > rather than on the properties of the consumer this indicates that the
> > consumer has a problem  If the consumer is doing this based on the
> > properties of the regulator rather than on the properties of the
> > consumer this indicates that the consumer has a problem

> The specific case that I am trying to tackle is as follows:
> cpufreq-cpu0 uses definitions of voltages that are SoC specific. For a
> given frequency, the optimal voltage is X, max voltage(Y) is already
> expected to be in constraints for device functionality. We however want
> to find the closest voltage for a regulator in range X to Y best
> achievable by regulator. I think the area where I am getting confused is
> this: I am thinking the job belongs to the consumer/regulator core to
> find the best match. However, looking at implementations in existing
> regulators and based on your explanation, it seems to be the job of
> the regulator driver rather than the consumer/ regulator core to provide
> the best match.

Right, though the consumer does have to provide a voltage range to the
regulator to allow this to happen - if the consumer doesn't provide a
range then there's only one option available.  The consumer provides a
range and then the driver satistifes that as best it can (after it's
been filtered through the constraints).

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature