Re: [PATCH 2/2] regulator: palmas: model SMPS10 as two regulators
From: Laxman Dewangan
Date: Fri Jun 21 2013 - 09:20:46 EST
On Thursday 20 June 2013 08:56 PM, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
Hi,
On Thursday 20 June 2013 08:14 PM, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
Have you added the regulator supply entries?
Are you testing on mainline linux-next?
Not in linux-next :-( Tested only with mainline.
Does inverting the order helps?
I think because you do not have entry of supply in your dt node, it gets
ignored by regulator_dev_lookup() and continue.
I made the entry like (added entry form smps10-out2-supply and
smps10-in-supply in dt node) and then it failed.
/***
+ smps10-out2-supply = <&palmas_smps10_out2_reg>;
+ smps10-in-supply = <&tps65090_dcdc3_reg>;
ldo3-in-supply = <&palmas_smps3_reg>;
@@ -903,6 +905,20 @@
regulator-always-on;
};
+ palmas_smps10_out1_reg: smps10_out1 {
+ regulator-name = "smps10_out1";
+ regulator-min-microvolt = <5000000>;
+ regulator-max-microvolt = <5000000>;
+ regulator-always-on;
+ };
+
+ palmas_smps10_out2_reg: smps10_out2 {
+ regulator-name = "smps10_out2";
+ regulator-min-microvolt = <5000000>;
+ regulator-max-microvolt = <5000000>;
+ regulator-always-on;
+ };
+
**/
After reversing the sequence, it worked fine.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/