Re: [PATCH 1/5] page_isolation: Fix a comment typo in test_pages_isolated()

From: Tang Chen
Date: Thu Jun 20 2013 - 21:09:57 EST


On 06/20/2013 09:17 PM, Zhang Yanfei wrote:
On 06/20/2013 06:10 PM, Tang Chen wrote:
pageblock_nr_page should be pageblock_nr_pages, and fist is
a typo of first.

Signed-off-by: Tang Chen<tangchen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
mm/page_isolation.c | 8 ++++----
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/page_isolation.c b/mm/page_isolation.c
index 383bdbb..0cee10f 100644
--- a/mm/page_isolation.c
+++ b/mm/page_isolation.c
@@ -226,9 +226,9 @@ int test_pages_isolated(unsigned long start_pfn, unsigned long end_pfn,
int ret;

/*
- * Note: pageblock_nr_page != MAX_ORDER. Then, chunks of free page
- * is not aligned to pageblock_nr_pages.
- * Then we just check pagetype fist.
+ * Note: pageblock_nr_pages != MAX_ORDER. Then, chunks of free pages

pageblock_nr_pages is the count of pages while MAX_ORDER is a order. Here
may be pageblock_order != MAX_ORDER.

Hum, yes. Since we have:
#define pageblock_nr_pages (1UL << pageblock_order)

it should be pageblock_order.

+ * are not aligned to pageblock_nr_pages.
+ * Then we just check migratetype first.
*/
for (pfn = start_pfn; pfn< end_pfn; pfn += pageblock_nr_pages) {
page = __first_valid_page(pfn, pageblock_nr_pages);
@@ -238,7 +238,7 @@ int test_pages_isolated(unsigned long start_pfn, unsigned long end_pfn,
page = __first_valid_page(start_pfn, end_pfn - start_pfn);
if ((pfn< end_pfn) || !page)
return -EBUSY;
- /* Check all pages are free or Marked as ISOLATED */
+ /* Check all pages are free or marked as ISOLATED */
zone = page_zone(page);
spin_lock_irqsave(&zone->lock, flags);
ret = __test_page_isolated_in_pageblock(start_pfn, end_pfn,


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/