Re: [PATCH v2] kernel/itimer.c: beautify code, not need check 'value',so save one instruction, simpler and easier for readers.

From: Chen Gang
Date: Thu Jun 20 2013 - 08:03:56 EST



Oh, sorry, maybe it is a trivial patch, also need send to
trivial@xxxxxxxxxxx


On 06/20/2013 07:26 PM, Chen Gang wrote:
>
> Since copy_to_user() will check 'value', we do not need check it outside
> again, so can save one comparing instruction at least.
>
> Also can let code simpler and easier for readers: if checking parameter
> 'value', it will easily lead readers to think about why not return
> -EINVAL instead of -EFAULT, when checking parameter failed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chen Gang <gang.chen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> kernel/itimer.c | 13 ++++++-------
> 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/itimer.c b/kernel/itimer.c
> index 8d262b4..3b12271 100644
> --- a/kernel/itimer.c
> +++ b/kernel/itimer.c
> @@ -102,15 +102,14 @@ int do_getitimer(int which, struct itimerval *value)
>
> SYSCALL_DEFINE2(getitimer, int, which, struct itimerval __user *, value)
> {
> - int error = -EFAULT;
> + int error;
> struct itimerval get_buffer;
>
> - if (value) {
> - error = do_getitimer(which, &get_buffer);
> - if (!error &&
> - copy_to_user(value, &get_buffer, sizeof(get_buffer)))
> - error = -EFAULT;
> - }
> + error = do_getitimer(which, &get_buffer);
> + if (!error &&
> + copy_to_user(value, &get_buffer, sizeof(get_buffer)))
> + error = -EFAULT;
> +
> return error;
> }
>
>


--
Chen Gang

Asianux Corporation
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/