[PATCH v5 7/7] locking-selftests: handle unexpected failures morestrictly

From: Maarten Lankhorst
Date: Thu Jun 20 2013 - 07:33:13 EST


When CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING is not enabled, more tests are expected to
pass unexpectedly, but there no tests that should start to fail that
pass with CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING enabled.

Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
lib/locking-selftest.c | 8 +++++---
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/lib/locking-selftest.c b/lib/locking-selftest.c
index d554f3f..aad024d 100644
--- a/lib/locking-selftest.c
+++ b/lib/locking-selftest.c
@@ -976,16 +976,18 @@ static void dotest(void (*testcase_fn)(void), int expected, int lockclass_mask)
/*
* Filter out expected failures:
*/
- if (debug_locks != expected) {
#ifndef CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING
+ if (expected == FAILURE && debug_locks) {
expected_testcase_failures++;
printk("failed|");
-#else
+ }
+ else
+#endif
+ if (debug_locks != expected) {
unexpected_testcase_failures++;
printk("FAILED|");

dump_stack();
-#endif
} else {
testcase_successes++;
printk(" ok |");

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/