Re: [PATCH] lp: implement proper detach function for parport_driverlp

From: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Date: Wed Jun 19 2013 - 14:32:08 EST


On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 07:04:51PM +0200, Hannes Weisbach wrote:
> >> Signed-off-by: Hannes Weisbach <hannes_weisbach@xxxxxxx>
> >> ---
> >> Granted, for normal parport drivers this is usually not an issue,
> >> because the device does not go away. However, I am currently writing a
> >> Linux device driver for a USB to parallel port converter [0] and
> >> therefore need proper detaching. Additionally, the wrong ref count
> >> keeps me from simply rmmod my driver and insmod a new version while
> >> developing and testing.
> >
> > Really? We already have a usb to parallel port driver in the kernel
> > tree that seems to work just fine.
>
> > It's been there since the 2.3 kernel
> > days, so either it has the same problem, or your driver is doing
> > something odd.
>
> Do you mean the USB Printer class driver for pseudo parallel port
> adapters? They don't use the char/lp.c printer driver. (Or I didn't
> see it). I'm writing a driver for USB2LPT [0], which gives you a real
> /dev/parportN-device in user space, with which you can do all the
> bit-twiddling like with a real parallel port.
>
> Or do you mean USS720 (misc/uss720.c) and MOS7715 (serial/mos7720.c)
> drivers.

Yes, I mean these.

> They are doing what I am doing: translating whatever the
> user does on a /dev/parportN-node and sending device-specific commands
> over USB. When they do parport_announce_port(), lp.c should also be
> initialized and they should have the same problem.

Why hasn't anyone reported that problem then? Surely someone must use
these, they've been in the kernel tree for over a decade now.

> On second thought, my patch might not be optimal. lp.c stores
> instance-structs in an array of size 8. So after 8 re-plugs, lp.c
> will not instantiate any more printer devices. I think I better go
> all the way and replace that array with a list, to have a proper
> solution.

Proper solutions are always good :)

thanks,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/