Re: [RFC patch 1/4] sched: change cfs_rq load avg to unsigned long
From: Alex Shi
Date: Tue Jun 18 2013 - 00:57:09 EST
On 06/07/2013 03:29 PM, Alex Shi wrote:
> Since the 'u64 runnable_load_avg, blocked_load_avg' in cfs_rq struct are
> smaller than 'unsigned long' cfs_rq->load.weight. We don't need u64
> vaiables to describe them. unsigned long is more efficient and convenience.
>
update with a a bit clean up in tg_load_down()
---