Re: [PATCH 4/4 v2] silicom: checkpatch: errors caused by macros

[Joe Perches]

On Mon, 2013-06-17 at 14:14 -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 02:03:43PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> > Generally I think it's better that new submitters patches
> > should go through more strict reviews and be as correct
> > as possible.  I think this is especially true for patches
> > that are just checkpatch driven.
> 
> I totally disagree, sorry.

I'm unsurprised.  We have different tastes.

While whitespace only cleanup patches have some use,
for these types of patches, I'm more interested in
educating others what sorts of patches have higher
value.

o defects
o style/readability
o whitespace

As always, ymmv.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/