[PATCH 0/3] tracing: more list_empty(perf_events) checks

From: Oleg Nesterov
Date: Mon Jun 17 2013 - 13:07:13 EST


Hello.

Steven, we already discussed this a bit some time ago...

DECLARE_EVENT_CLASS()->perf_trace_##call() is not trivial because
of __perf_task(), but perhaps we can change other
perf_trace_buf_submit(task => NULL) callers.


And can't we factor out WARN_ONCE(size > PERF_MAX_TRACE_SIZE) ?
See 3/3. I won't argue if you dislike it.

Oleg.

include/trace/ftrace.h | 4 ----
kernel/trace/trace_event_perf.c | 10 ++++++++--
kernel/trace/trace_kprobe.c | 6 ------
kernel/trace/trace_syscalls.c | 24 ++++++++----------------
kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c | 2 --
5 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/