Re: [PATCH 2/6] pinctrl: sunxi: Move the pins definitions to aseparate header

From: Maxime Ripard
Date: Mon Jun 17 2013 - 04:41:33 EST


Hi Linus,

On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 01:03:09PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 6:36 PM, Maxime Ripard
> <maxime.ripard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > It will allow us to have a cleaner separation between the data needed by
> > the driver to work, and the core logic of the driver in itself, and will
> > allow having too much noise in the core driver in the future.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Patch applied.
>
> Since you will anyway have to bring the ARM SoC branch on
> top of the pinctrl tree, I might as well apply this to my tree.

Thanks for merging this.

I applied the other patches except for the 5th one that Emilio commented
on.

> If everything else fails, you'll have a nice development base
> in v3.11 with this in place, right?

Yes, As far as I can see, we should have a pretty complete support for
the GPIO/muxing/IRQ on the "old" allwinner SoCs (sun4i and sun5i) now.

Maxime

--
Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/