Re: [PATCH 1/2] list: add list_for_each_entry_del

[JÃrn Engel]

On Thu, 6 June 2013 22:32:55 +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 8:28 PM, Joern Engel <joern@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > I have seen a lot of boilerplate code that either follows the pattern of
> >         while (!list_empty(head)) {
> >                 pos = list_entry(head->next, struct foo, list);
> >                 list_del(pos->list);
> >                 ...
> >         }
> > or some variant thereof.
> 
> What the problem to use list_for_each_safe()?

The loop may terminate with elements left on the list.  There is more,
but I would consider this the main problem.

JÃrn

--
If you're willing to restrict the flexibility of your approach,
you can almost always do something better.
-- John Carmack
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/