Re: [PATCH 00/16] perf, persistent: Kernel updates for perf toolintegration

[Borislav Petkov]

On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 11:32:10AM +0200, Robert Richter wrote:
> Hmm, since the changes in the onliner patches are either hard effort
> to find in reviewing/testing or more or less related to the new
> implementation, I better prefer to keep authorship as well to document
> the code development (don't blame me about patch count ;)). We better
> should add a branch (preferable at topic branch in tip?) as soon as
> possible for this.

Yes, you should definitely keep authorship - simply state this in the
commit message, add your SOB, etc. However, I don't want to have messy
history for patches which haven't been reviewed yet. This complicates
review needlessly and makes absolutely no sense for later when you stare
at the history.

Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/