Re: [PATCH v7 net-next 2/5] net: implement support for low latencysocket polling

[Amir Vadai]

On 30/05/2013 14:41, Eliezer Tamir wrote:
> diff --git a/fs/select.c b/fs/select.c
> index 8c1c96c..f116bf0 100644
> --- a/fs/select.c
> +++ b/fs/select.c
> @@ -27,6 +27,7 @@
>  #include <linux/rcupdate.h>
>  #include <linux/hrtimer.h>
>  #include <linux/sched/rt.h>
> +#include <net/ll_poll.h>
>  
>  #include <asm/uaccess.h>
>  
> @@ -400,6 +401,7 @@ int do_select(int n, fd_set_bits *fds, struct timespec *end_time)
>  	poll_table *wait;
>  	int retval, i, timed_out = 0;
>  	unsigned long slack = 0;
> +	cycles_t ll_time = ll_end_time();
>  
>  	rcu_read_lock();
>  	retval = max_select_fd(n, fds);
> @@ -486,6 +488,8 @@ int do_select(int n, fd_set_bits *fds, struct timespec *end_time)
>  			break;
>  		}
>  
> +		if (can_poll_ll(ll_time))
> +			continue;
I don't see here discrimination between sockets that you want to poll
and other sockets.
So it means that select will busy poll every type of file descriptor
instead of going to sleep.
Should have a condition with something like sk_valid_ll()

>  		/*
>  		 * If this is the first loop and we have a timeout
>  		 * given, then we convert to ktime_t and set the to


...

> +static inline void sk_mark_ll(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
> +{
> +}
> +
> +static inline bool can_poll_ll(unsigned long end_time)
should use here cycles_t too.

> +{
> +	return false;
> +}
> +
> +#endif /* CONFIG_NET_LL_RX_POLL */
> +#endif /* _LINUX_NET_LL_POLL_H */


Also, something general about this patch. I think you should split out
to separate patches all the users of the feature, like you did for TCP.
I would suggest small patches for UDP, select and poll.

Thanks,
Amir
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/