[PATCH] RFC: Set irq thread to RT priority on creation

From: Ivo Sieben
Date: Thu May 30 2013 - 08:13:29 EST


When a threaded irq handler is installed the irq thread is initially created
on normal scheduling priority. Only after the the irq thread is woken up it
sets its priority to RT_FIFO MAX_USER_RT_PRIO/2.

This means that interrupts that occur directly after the irq handler is
installed will be handled on a normal scheduling priority instead of the
realtime priority that you would expect. Fixed this by setting the RT
priority on creation of the irq_thread.

Signed-off-by: Ivo Sieben <meltedpianoman@xxxxxxxxx>
---

RFC:
Whas there a specific reason for the irq_thread to be created on normal
scheduling and only set to RT priority when woken up?
This patch solves an issue for me where a device driver is expected to handle an
interrupt immediatly after irq handlers are installed and interrupts enabled.

(If this does make sense: I guess the sched_setscheduler() call in the irq_thread
function can be removed?)

kernel/irq/manage.c | 6 ++++++
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)

diff --git a/kernel/irq/manage.c b/kernel/irq/manage.c
index fa17855..0ffe37b 100644
--- a/kernel/irq/manage.c
+++ b/kernel/irq/manage.c
@@ -950,6 +950,9 @@ __setup_irq(unsigned int irq, struct irq_desc *desc, struct irqaction *new)
*/
if (new->thread_fn && !nested) {
struct task_struct *t;
+ static const struct sched_param param = {
+ .sched_priority = MAX_USER_RT_PRIO/2,
+ };

t = kthread_create(irq_thread, new, "irq/%d-%s", irq,
new->name);
@@ -957,6 +960,9 @@ __setup_irq(unsigned int irq, struct irq_desc *desc, struct irqaction *new)
ret = PTR_ERR(t);
goto out_mput;
}
+
+ sched_setscheduler(t, SCHED_FIFO, &param);
+
/*
* We keep the reference to the task struct even if
* the thread dies to avoid that the interrupt code
--
1.7.9.5


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/