Re: [PATCH v5 net-next 1/5] net: add napi_id and hash

[Eric Dumazet]

On Tue, 2013-05-28 at 11:03 +0300, Eliezer Tamir wrote:

> With an atomic we don't need the RTNL in any of the napi_id functions.
> One less thing to worry about when we try to remove the RTNL.

OK but we'll need something to protect the lists against concurrent
insert/deletes.

A spinlock or a mutex.



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/