Re: [PATCH] ARM: OMAP4: USB_EHCI_HCD needs USB_PHY and NOP_USB_XCEIV

[Adrien VergÃ]

Dear Arnd and Roger, thank you for your answers.

2013/5/28 Roger Quadros <rogerq@xxxxxx>
> Selecting NOP_USB_XCEIV is wrong as it in turn depends on USB_PHY.
>
> I'm not for depends as it would hide USB_EHCI_HCD_OMAP in menuconfig.
> I'm for explicitly selecting both, as it makes the user's life much
> easier.
> But I'm afraid maintainers might object to that.
>
> The other option is to enable the required drivers in omap2plus_defconfig.
> http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ports.arm.omap/97899

This seems a good idea to me, since many OMAP users boot with NFS and
need USB directly working (Ethernet over USB).

> Maybe you could just resend that patch after addressing Kevin's comments?

It's sad that USB_EHCI_HCD is too instable to be added in omap2plus_defconfig.
Still, USB_PHY and NOP_USB_XCEIV are needed since v3.10 for USB
support (and harmless): should I send a patch adding those two in
omap2plus_defconfig?

Cheers,
Adrien
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/