Re: Patch for thinkpad-acpi.c

[BjÃrn Mork]

Bruce <bruce.ma@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> +struct blacklist lenovo_blacklist[] = {
> +  {
> +    .model_s = "Lenovo LM490s",
> +    .nummodel_s = "814YG01",
> +  },


The driver already has a list of LED support per model in the 

  static const struct tpacpi_quirk led_useful_qtable[] __initconst = {}

array.   Why do you duplicate this with lots of new model checking code
instead of just using the code that's already there?

>  static void led_exit(void)
>  {
> +        if (no_led == 1 ) {


The driver already has provisions for signalling that LEDs are
unsupported through the 'led_supported' variable.  Why do you add
another variable, and duplicate testing in every access function?

But I don't think this part is needed at all, as long as you set up the
proper LED map in led_useful_qtable.



BjÃrn
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/