Re: [PATCH 5/8] Documentation: Replacing reference to brokensubmission format URL

From: Rob Landley
Date: Fri May 24 2013 - 00:16:25 EST


On 05/23/2013 07:49:57 AM, Ben Minerds wrote:
Replacing refs to broken URL with internal documentation reference, and a
little whitespace shuffle to keep it under 80 chars wide.

Signed-off-by: Ben Minerds <puzzleduck@xxxxxxxxx>
---
Documentation/HOWTO | 10 +++++-----
Documentation/SubmittingPatches | 2 +-
Documentation/ja_JP/HOWTO | 8 ++++----
Documentation/ja_JP/SubmittingPatches | 2 +-
Documentation/ko_KR/HOWTO | 2 +-
Documentation/zh_CN/HOWTO | 2 +-
Documentation/zh_CN/SubmittingPatches | 2 +-
7 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/HOWTO b/Documentation/HOWTO
index 11e597e..fba34c0 100644
--- a/Documentation/HOWTO
+++ b/Documentation/HOWTO
@@ -110,11 +110,11 @@ required reading:
subject to scrutiny for content and style), but not following them
will almost always prevent it.

- Other excellent descriptions of how to create patches properly are:
- "The Perfect Patch"
- Documentation/development-process/patches/The-Perfect-Patch.txt
- "Linux kernel patch submission format"
- http://linux.yyz.us/patch-format.html
+ Other excellent descriptions of how to create patches properly are:
+ "The Perfect Patch"
+ Documentation/development-process/patches/The-Perfect-Patch.txt
+ "Linux kernel patch submission format"
+ Documentation/development-process/patches/Patch-Submission-Format.txt

Ok, this is the third consecutive patch to do approximately the same thing, and now you're patching lines you added in a previous patch in the same series.

Breaking files up into stages helps with bisectability. Are we really going to "git bisect" documentation?

On the larger question of "is this a good idea", I'm leaning towards "no" and would like you to explain why an 8 year old description duplicating portions of SubmittingPatches needs to be in-tree.

Rob--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/