Re: [PATCH] mm: fix up a spurious page fault whenever it happens

From: Steven Rostedt
Date: Thu May 23 2013 - 11:27:26 EST


On Thu, 2013-05-23 at 08:06 -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:

> We don't even need the jump_label infrastructure -- we have
> static_cpu_has*() which actually predates jump_label although it uses
> the same underlying ideas.

Ah right. I wonder if it would be worth consolidating a lot of these
"modifying of code" infrastructures. Which reminds me, I need to update
text_poke() to do things similar to what ftrace does, and get rid of the
stop machine code.

-- Steve


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/