Re: OOPS in perf_mmap_close()

[Peter Zijlstra]

On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 02:09:10PM +0000, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Thu, 23 May 2013, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> 
> > Right it doesn't. I think the easiest solution for now is to not copy the VMA
> > on fork().
> 
> Right. Pinned pages are not inherited. If a page is unpinned then that is
> going to happen for all address spaces that reference the page.
> 
> > But I totally missed patch bc3e53f682d that introduced pinned_vm, AFAICT that
> > also wrecked some accounting. We should still account both against
> > RLIMIT_MEMLOCK.
> 
> The point of the patch was to unwreck accounting. Before the patch mlocked
> pages were counted twice which resulted in stramge VM scenarios where more
> pages were mlocked than memory available. Note that a pinned page may also
> be mlocked.
> 
> Simply adding the two will reintroduce the problems that were fixed by the
> patch.

The patch completely fails to explain how RLIMIT_LOCKED is supposed to
deal with pinned vs locked. Perf used to account its pages against
RLIMIT_LOCKED, with the patch it compares pinned against RLIMIT_LOCKED
but completely discards any possible locked pages.

IMO that's broken.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/