Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: cpufreq-cpu0: use the exact frequency for clk_set_rate()

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

On Wednesday, May 22, 2013 08:12:22 PM Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> Hi Rafael
> 
> I don't see this patch in your cpufreq branch nor in next or Linus' trees, 
> has it been pulled yet?

No, I haven't applied it yet, not sure why exactly.

In the future it's better to CC cpufreq patches to linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx so
that the kernel.org Patchwork can pick them up.  I'm much less likely to
overlook them then.

This is a fix, so do we need it in 3.10-rc?

Rafael


> On Thu, 28 Mar 2013, Shawn Guo wrote:
> 
> > On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 11:46:38PM +0100, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> > > Hi Shawn
> > > 
> > > On Mon, 25 Feb 2013, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> > > 
> > > > clk_set_rate() isn't supposed to accept approximate frequencies, instead
> > > > a supported frequency should be obtained from clk_round_rate() and then
> > > > used to set the clock.
> > > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@xxxxxx>
> > > 
> > > Can I have your ack for this one, please?
> > 
> > Acked-by: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > 
> 
> ---
> Guennadi Liakhovetski, Ph.D.
> Freelance Open-Source Software Developer
> http://www.open-technology.de/
-- 
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/