Re: [PATCH] TTY:vt: convert remain take_over_console's users to do_take_over_console

[Peter Hurley]

On 05/21/2013 12:29 PM, Wang YanQing wrote:
> On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 12:18:49AM +0800, Wang YanQing wrote:
> > > Except now you're spreading the brokenness that is console_lock()
> > > over many more source files than the single-use case of
> > > do_take_over_console().
> >
> > > The actual interface is take_over_console(); the _workaround_ is
> > > exposing do_take_over_console() for fbcon to wrap.
> >
> > This _workaround_ willn't work, take_over_console will hold console_lock internal,
> > but do_take_over_console need caller hold console_lock, then we can't rewrite
> > do_take_over_console as a wrap base on take_over_console.

The workaround I'm referring to is commit 50e244cc793 which
exposed do_take_over_console() as an interface to band aid the lock
problems.

I'm ok with take_over_console() being a lock wrapper around
do_take_over_console(), if you are trying to preserve your
other changes.

Regards,
Peter Hurley



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/