Re: [PATCH 2/5] perf: Reorder parameters of strglobmatch

From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
Date: Tue May 21 2013 - 05:20:52 EST


Em Fri, May 17, 2013 at 11:21:11AM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu escreveu:
> (2013/05/16 23:55), Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > I'm a bit confused to the rational here. Can you explain in more detail
> > to why this patch is actually needed?

> Yes, actually, this patch is not needed from the viewpoint of execution,
> but less misuse for future use of the strglobmatch, I think.

> For example, glob(3) has the pattern parameter as the first one,
>
> int glob(const char *pattern, int flags,
> int (*errfunc) (const char *epath, int eerrno),
> glob_t *pglob);

> regexec(3) also has the compiled regexp at the first parameter,

> int regexec(const regex_t *preg, const char *string, size_t nmatch,
> regmatch_t pmatch[], int eflags);

> Thus, I think a new user of strglobmatch() may guess that the first
> parameter should be the glob pattern.

> So, this patch is not technically needed, but from the viewpoint of coding
> naturally, it should be changed, IMHO.

So I suggest you state this in the changeset comment :-)

- Arnaldo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/