Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 1/4] net: implement support for low latencysocket polling

[David Miller]

From: Eliezer Tamir <eliezer.tamir@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 20 May 2013 12:39:59 +0300

> On 20/05/2013 10:54, David Miller wrote:
>> From: Eliezer Tamir <eliezer.tamir@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Date: Sun, 19 May 2013 13:25:33 +0300
>>
>>> +#else /* CONFIG_INET_LL_RX_FLUSH */
>>> +
>>> +#define sk_valid_ll(sk) 0
>>> +#define sk_poll_ll(sk, nonblock) do {} while (0)
>>> +#define skb_mark_ll(napi, skb) do {} while (0)
>>> +#define sk_mark_ll(sk, skb) do {} while (0)
>>
>> Make these inline functions too, so that even if
>> CONFIG_INET_LL_RX_POLL is disabled, the arguments and return values
>> are still properly type checked.
> 
> Is this what you had in mind?
> 
> static inline bool sk_valid_ll(struct sock *sk)

Yes.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/