Re: [ 027/102] x86, vm86: fix VM86 syscalls: use SYSCALL_DEFINEx(...)

[Greg Kroah-Hartman]

On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 04:51:33PM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 11:49:30PM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> > On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 02:35:42PM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > 3.9-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
> > 
> > This is seriously wrong.  For 3.9 you _need_ asmlinkage_protect() in that
> > thing; by the time when that went into the tree, mainline already had
> > it generated automatically by SYSCALL_DEFINE, so there was no point in
> > that part of patch - the switch to SYSCALL_DEFINE alone did the job.
> > For 3.9 it's very much needed; as the matter of fact, in 3.9 that commit
> > is a no-op in the form you took.
> > 
> > We can grab all prereqs into 3.9-stable (there's not that much of those),
> > but that would be much more intrusive than the variant adding explicit
> > asmlinkage_protect() in those two syscalls.
> 
> Ok, Alexander was saying something was off here.
> 
> Can someone send me just the needed patch to get this working properly,
> and I will be glad to drop this one from the 3.9.x tree.

I've now dropped this, and will release without it.

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/