Re: [PATCH 3.9-stable] NTB: memcpy lockup workaround

From: Jon Mason
Date: Sat May 18 2013 - 10:48:55 EST


On Sat, May 18, 2013 at 11:52:17AM +0900, Jonghwan Choi wrote:
> From: Jon Mason <jon.mason@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> This patch looks like it should be in the 3.9-stable tree, should we apply
> it?

Yes, thanks.

>
> ------------------
>
> From: "Jon Mason <jon.mason@xxxxxxxxx>"
>
> commit c336acd3331dcc191a97dbc66a557d47741657c7 upstream
>
> The system will appear to lockup for long periods of time due to the NTB
> driver spending too much time in memcpy. Avoid this by reducing the
> number of packets that can be serviced on a given interrupt.
>
> Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> # 3.9.x: ad3e2751: ntb: off by one
> Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> # 3.9.x: cc0f868d: NTB: fix pointer math
> Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> # 3.9.x: 113fc505: NTB: Handle 64bit BAR
> Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> # 3.9.x: b77b2637: NTB: Link toggle memory
> Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> # 3.9.x: 90f9e934: NTB: reset tx_index on
> Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> # 3.9.x: c9d534c8: NTB: Correctly handle receive
> Signed-off-by: Jon Mason <jon.mason@xxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Jonghwan Choi <jhbird.choi@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/ntb/ntb_transport.c | 11 ++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/ntb/ntb_transport.c b/drivers/ntb/ntb_transport.c
> index a288a26..0f66daa 100644
> --- a/drivers/ntb/ntb_transport.c
> +++ b/drivers/ntb/ntb_transport.c
> @@ -1034,11 +1034,16 @@ out:
> static void ntb_transport_rx(unsigned long data)
> {
> struct ntb_transport_qp *qp = (struct ntb_transport_qp *)data;
> - int rc;
> + int rc, i;
>
> - do {
> + /* Limit the number of packets processed in a single interrupt to
> + * provide fairness to others
> + */
> + for (i = 0; i < qp->rx_max_entry; i++) {
> rc = ntb_process_rxc(qp);
> - } while (!rc);
> + if (rc)
> + break;
> + }
> }
>
> static void ntb_transport_rxc_db(void *data, int db_num)
> --
> 1.8.1.2
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/