Re: [PATCH 0/3] CPUFreq Fixes for 3.10-rc2

From: Rafael J. Wysocki
Date: Sat May 18 2013 - 05:08:01 EST

On Saturday, May 18, 2013 07:45:45 AM Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 18 May 2013 05:10, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Well, I actually meant "can you please verify your belief?". :-)
> >
> > And that's because I'm wondering why the zero-day build testing doesn't
> > catch this problem. Apparently, it doesn't build .configs with cpufreq
> > governors configured as modules, although I believe it does test
> > "make allmodconfig" for a couple of architectures at least. What gives?
> My assumption was wrong. Actually cpufreq_governor.c is never compiled
> as module, but cpufreq_ondemand is...
> And this routine isn't used from cpufreq_ondemand but cpufreq_governor..
> But we were lucky that we didn't get a error here and EXPORT_SYMBOL
> is still required :)

Although not necessarily 3.10 material I suppose?


I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at