[ 024/136 ] xen/smp/spinlock: Fix leakage of the spinlock interrupt line forevery CPU online/offline

From: Steven Rostedt
Date: Fri May 17 2013 - 22:27:31 EST stable review patch.
If anyone has any objections, please let me know.


From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx>

[ Upstream commit 66ff0fe9e7bda8aec99985b24daad03652f7304e ]

While we don't use the spinlock interrupt line (see for details
commit f10cd522c5fbfec9ae3cc01967868c9c2401ed23 -
xen: disable PV spinlocks on HVM) - we should still do the proper
init / deinit sequence. We did not do that correctly and for the
CPU init for PVHVM guest we would allocate an interrupt line - but
failed to deallocate the old interrupt line.

This resulted in leakage of an irq_desc but more importantly this splat
as we online an offlined CPU:

genirq: Flags mismatch irq 71. 0002cc20 (spinlock1) vs. 0002cc20 (spinlock1)
Pid: 2542, comm: init.late Not tainted 3.9.0-rc6upstream #1
Call Trace:
[<ffffffff811156de>] __setup_irq+0x23e/0x4a0
[<ffffffff81194191>] ? kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0x221/0x250
[<ffffffff811161bb>] request_threaded_irq+0xfb/0x160
[<ffffffff8104c6f0>] ? xen_spin_trylock+0x20/0x20
[<ffffffff813a8423>] bind_ipi_to_irqhandler+0xa3/0x160
[<ffffffff81303758>] ? kasprintf+0x38/0x40
[<ffffffff8104c6f0>] ? xen_spin_trylock+0x20/0x20
[<ffffffff810cad35>] ? update_max_interval+0x15/0x40
[<ffffffff816605db>] xen_init_lock_cpu+0x3c/0x78
[<ffffffff81660029>] xen_hvm_cpu_notify+0x29/0x33
[<ffffffff81676bdd>] notifier_call_chain+0x4d/0x70
[<ffffffff810bb2a9>] __raw_notifier_call_chain+0x9/0x10
[<ffffffff8109402b>] __cpu_notify+0x1b/0x30
[<ffffffff8166834a>] _cpu_up+0xa0/0x14b
[<ffffffff816684ce>] cpu_up+0xd9/0xec
[<ffffffff8165f754>] store_online+0x94/0xd0
[<ffffffff8141d15b>] dev_attr_store+0x1b/0x20
[<ffffffff81218f44>] sysfs_write_file+0xf4/0x170
[<ffffffff811a2864>] vfs_write+0xb4/0x130
[<ffffffff811a302a>] sys_write+0x5a/0xa0
[<ffffffff8167ada9>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
cpu 1 spinlock event irq -16
smpboot: Booting Node 0 Processor 1 APIC 0x2

And if one looks at the /proc/interrupts right after
offlining (CPU1):

70: 0 0 xen-percpu-ipi spinlock0
71: 0 0 xen-percpu-ipi spinlock1
77: 0 0 xen-percpu-ipi spinlock2

There is the oddity of the 'spinlock1' still being present.

CC: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
arch/x86/xen/smp.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/arch/x86/xen/smp.c b/arch/x86/xen/smp.c
index 3fc224d..641c91e 100644
--- a/arch/x86/xen/smp.c
+++ b/arch/x86/xen/smp.c
@@ -667,6 +667,7 @@ static void xen_hvm_cpu_die(unsigned int cpu)
unbind_from_irqhandler(per_cpu(xen_debug_irq, cpu), NULL);
unbind_from_irqhandler(per_cpu(xen_callfuncsingle_irq, cpu), NULL);
unbind_from_irqhandler(per_cpu(xen_irq_work, cpu), NULL);
+ xen_uninit_lock_cpu(cpu);

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/