Re: [patch v3 -mm 1/3] memcg: integrate soft reclaim tighter withzone shrinking code

From: Michal Hocko
Date: Fri May 17 2013 - 03:17:02 EST

On Thu 16-05-13 15:15:01, Tejun Heo wrote:
> One more thing,
> Given that this is a rather significant behavior change, it probably
> is a good idea to include the the benchmark results from the head
> message?

The testing I have done was on top of the complete series. The last
patch should be irrelevant as I have tested the global reclaim but the
second patch might still influence figures a tiny bit (we still do the
soft limit tree thing). That's why I haven't pushed the numbers here.

I can add that information if people prefer or just ask Andrew to squash
the leader email into the first patch as he tend to do quite often in
other cases as well.
Michal Hocko
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at