Re: [PATCH 0/3] CPUFreq Fixes for 3.10-rc2

From: Rafael J. Wysocki
Date: Thu May 16 2013 - 16:43:10 EST

On Thursday, May 16, 2013 02:09:46 PM Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 16 May 2013 14:16, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Thursday, May 16, 2013 10:39:55 AM Viresh Kumar wrote:
> >> Hi Rafael,
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> >> Here are few more fixes for 3.10-rc2.
> >
> > I'm actually going to sent the for-rc2 request today, so these are for -rc3.
> Okay. No issues.

While I kind of understand why you want [3/3] to go into 3.10, I'm wondering
about the other two patches. Why exactly are they needed now?

And speaking of patch [3/3], if you paste kernel logs into changelogs, please
remove the time stamps (unless they are relevant to the problem being fixed).


I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at