Re: [PATCH] staging: vme: fix error return code in vme_user_probe()

[Dan Carpenter]

On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 02:56:17PM +0100, Martyn Welch wrote:
> On 13/05/13 09:51, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> > On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 09:16:00AM +0100, Martyn Welch wrote:
> >> On 13/05/13 07:05, Wei Yongjun wrote:
> >>> From: Wei Yongjun <yongjun_wei@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>>
> >>> Fix to return -ENOMEM in the resource alloc error handling
> >>> case instead of 0, as done elsewhere in this function.
> >>>
> >>
> >> Hi Wei,
> >>
> >> Thanks for your patch. As this is resource allocation rather than memory
> >> allocation that is failing, would -EAGAIN not make more sense than -ENOMEM?
> >>
> > 
> > ENOMEM is better.  EAGAIN is for when trylock() fails etc.  In other
> > words we are not allowed to block and someone is using the lock we
> > need.
> > 
> 
> ENOMEM just doesn't seem to describe the error very well. This error will be
> triggered if no free VME windows are available for the driver to use - there
> are typically 8 master and 8 slave windows provided in hardware.
> 
> How about EBUSY (Device or resource busy)?

EBUSY would work.

regards,
dan carpenter

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/