Re: [PATCH RESEND v3 00/11] mm: fixup changers of per cpu pageset's->high and ->batch

From: Pekka Enberg
Date: Mon May 13 2013 - 15:20:59 EST


Hi Cody,

On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 10:08 PM, Cody P Schafer
<cody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> "Problems" with the current code:
> 1. there is a lack of synchronization in setting ->high and ->batch in
> percpu_pagelist_fraction_sysctl_handler()
> 2. stop_machine() in zone_pcp_update() is unnecissary.
> 3. zone_pcp_update() does not consider the case where percpu_pagelist_fraction is non-zero

Maybe it's just me but I find the above problem description confusing.
How does the problem manifest itself? How did you find about it? Why
do we need to fix all three problems in the same patch set?

Pekka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/