Re: [PATCH v5 6/7] sched: consider runnable load average in move_tasks

[Alex Shi]

On 05/09/2013 01:29 PM, Alex Shi wrote:
> 
> I reviewed the cfs_rq->blocked_load_avg code path, no clear abnormal found.
> Seems the blocked load avg is fit current balance rules.

Sorry, I mean, the blocked load avg doesn't fit current balance rules.
The reason is blow, any comments on this?
> Sometime the blocked load far bigger than runnable load. The blocked_load_avg 
> has a long time effect(more than half weight in 32ms), that drives wakeup task to other
> cpus not locate, and give unnecessary load in periodic balance, isn't it?


-- 
Thanks
    Alex
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/