Re: [PATCH 0/3] pm: Introduce __pm to mark power management code

[Guenter Roeck]

On Thu, May 09, 2013 at 09:15:00PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Thursday, May 09, 2013 10:09:23 AM Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > The following patch series introduces a marker for power management functions
> > and data. This this marker, #ifdef CONFIG_PM and #ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
> > can be removed from most of the code. This ensures that the conditional code
> > still compiles but is not included in the object file.
> > 
> > As a side effect, drivers declaring struct dev_pm_ops unconditionally
> > get a bit smaller if CONFIG_PM_SLEEP is not configured.
> > 
> > The first patch in the series introduces the marker, the following
> > two patches introduce the marker in two drivers to demonstrate its use.
> > 
> > The patch series depends on the "PM: Add pm_ops_ptr() macro" patch
> > submitted by Jingoo Han.
> 
> What about CCing a PM core maintainer?
> 
Actually, that was the idea. Somehow my send script got screwed up.
No idea what happened. Sorry for that.

Guenter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/