Re: [PATCH 0/3] pm: Introduce __pm to mark power management code

[Alan Stern]

On Thu, 9 May 2013, Guenter Roeck wrote:

> The following patch series introduces a marker for power management functions
> and data. This this marker, #ifdef CONFIG_PM and #ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
> can be removed from most of the code. This ensures that the conditional code
> still compiles but is not included in the object file.
> 
> As a side effect, drivers declaring struct dev_pm_ops unconditionally
> get a bit smaller if CONFIG_PM_SLEEP is not configured.

What about code that depends on CONFIG_PM_RUNTIME?  Or code that 
depends on CONFIG_PM_SLEEP but not on CONFIG_PM_RUNTIME?

Alan Stern


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/