Re: [PATCH RFC 09/48] Audit: make audit_enabled per user namespace

[Gao feng]

On 05/07/2013 11:44 PM, Aristeu Rozanski wrote:
> On Tue, May 07, 2013 at 10:20:30AM +0800, Gao feng wrote:
>> diff --git a/include/linux/audit.h b/include/linux/audit.h
>> index 684599b..33e6584 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/audit.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/audit.h
>> @@ -441,7 +441,8 @@ extern int audit_filter_type(int type);
>>  extern int  audit_receive_filter(int type, int pid, int seq,
>>  				void *data, size_t datasz, kuid_t loginuid,
>>  				u32 sessionid, u32 sid);
>> -extern int audit_enabled;
>> +#define audit_enabled (init_user_ns.audit.enabled)
>> +#define audit_enabled_ns (ns->audit.enabled)
>>  #else /* CONFIG_AUDIT */
>>  static inline __printf(4, 5)
>>  void audit_log(struct audit_context *ctx, gfp_t gfp_mask, int type,
>> @@ -487,6 +488,7 @@ static inline void audit_set_user_ns(struct user_namespace *ns)
>>  static inline void audit_free_user_ns(struct user_namespace *ns)
>>  { }
>>  #define audit_enabled 0
>> +#define audit_enabled_ns(ns) 0
> 
> conflicting definitions here. maybe the first one should be
> 	#define audit_enabled_ns(ns) (ns->audit.enabled)?
> 

Yes, it should be audit_enabled_ns(ns), I will fix this in next round.

>> @@ -285,14 +282,15 @@ static int audit_do_config_change(char *function_name, int *to_change,
>>  				  u32 sid)
>>  {
>>  	int allow_changes, rc = 0, old = *to_change;
>> +	struct user_namespace *ns = current_user_ns();
>>  
>>  	/* check if we are locked */
>> -	if (audit_enabled == AUDIT_LOCKED)
>> +	if (ns->audit.enabled == AUDIT_LOCKED)
> 
> then you don't use the macro you introduced?

will fix this too.

> 
>> @@ -609,7 +608,7 @@ static int audit_log_common_recv_msg(struct audit_buffer **ab, u16 msg_type,
>>  	char *ctx = NULL;
>>  	u32 len;
>>  
>> -	if (!audit_enabled) {
>> +	if (!init_user_ns.audit.enabled) {
>>  		*ab = NULL;
>>  		return rc;
>>  	}
> 
> same here
> 

Get it.

Thanks for your comments!

Gao

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/