[PATCH v2] init: Do not warn on non-zero initcall return
From: Steven Rostedt
Date: Wed May 01 2013 - 13:36:02 EST
Commit f91eb62f71 "init: scream bloody murder if interrupts are enabled
too early" added three new warnings. The first two seemed reasonable,
but the third included a warning when an initcall returned non-zero.
Although, the third WARN() does include an imbalanced preempt disabled,
or irqs disable, it shouldn't warn if it only had an initcall that just
returns non-zero.
In fact, according to Linus, it shouldn't print at all. As it only
prints with initcall_debug set, and that already shows enough
information to fix things.
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/CA+55aFzaBC5SFi7=F2mfm+KWY5qTsBmOqgbbs8E+LUS8JK-sBg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Suggested-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reported-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
diff --git a/init/main.c b/init/main.c
index bea1287..ceed17a 100644
--- a/init/main.c
+++ b/init/main.c
@@ -686,11 +686,8 @@ int __init_or_module do_one_initcall(initcall_t fn)
msgbuf[0] = 0;
- if (ret && ret != -ENODEV && initcall_debug)
- sprintf(msgbuf, "error code %d ", ret);
-
if (preempt_count() != count) {
- strlcat(msgbuf, "preemption imbalance ", sizeof(msgbuf));
+ sprintf(msgbuf, "preemption imbalance ");
preempt_count() = count;
}
if (irqs_disabled()) {
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/