[PATCH v2 05/13] x86, numa, acpi, memory-hotplug: Consider hotplug info when cleanup numa_meminfo.
From: Tang Chen
Date: Tue Apr 30 2013 - 05:18:50 EST
Since we have introduced hotplug info into struct numa_meminfo, we need
to consider it when cleanup numa_meminfo.
The original logic in numa_cleanup_meminfo() is:
Merge blocks on the same node, holes between which don't overlap with
memory on other nodes.
This patch modifies numa_cleanup_meminfo() logic like this:
Merge blocks with the same hotpluggable type on the same node, holes
between which don't overlap with memory on other nodes.
Signed-off-by: Tang Chen <tangchen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/x86/mm/numa.c | 13 +++++++++----
1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/numa.c b/arch/x86/mm/numa.c
index ecf37fd..26d1800 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/numa.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/numa.c
@@ -296,18 +296,22 @@ int __init numa_cleanup_meminfo(struct numa_meminfo *mi)
}
/*
- * Join together blocks on the same node, holes
- * between which don't overlap with memory on other
- * nodes.
+ * Join together blocks on the same node, with the same
+ * hotpluggable flags, holes between which don't overlap
+ * with memory on other nodes.
*/
if (bi->nid != bj->nid)
continue;
+ if (bi->hotpluggable != bj->hotpluggable)
+ continue;
+
start = min(bi->start, bj->start);
end = max(bi->end, bj->end);
for (k = 0; k < mi->nr_blks; k++) {
struct numa_memblk *bk = &mi->blk[k];
- if (bi->nid == bk->nid)
+ if (bi->nid == bk->nid &&
+ bi->hotpluggable == bk->hotpluggable)
continue;
if (start < bk->end && end > bk->start)
break;
@@ -327,6 +331,7 @@ int __init numa_cleanup_meminfo(struct numa_meminfo *mi)
for (i = mi->nr_blks; i < ARRAY_SIZE(mi->blk); i++) {
mi->blk[i].start = mi->blk[i].end = 0;
mi->blk[i].nid = NUMA_NO_NODE;
+ mi->blk[i].hotpluggable = false;
}
return 0;
--
1.7.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/