Re: linux-next: Tree for Apr 26

From: Sedat Dilek
Date: Fri Apr 26 2013 - 07:23:45 EST


On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 1:13 PM, Michal Marek <mmarek@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 26.4.2013 13:08, Michal Marek wrote:
>> On 26.4.2013 12:49, Sedat Dilek wrote:
>>> With reverting all kbuild-next commits I was able to build again.
>>>
>>> Revert "kconfig: implement KCONFIG_PROBABILITY for randconfig"
>>> Revert "kconfig: allow specifying the seed for randconfig"
>>> Revert "kconfig: fix randomising choice entries in presence of
>>> KCONFIG_ALLCONFIG"
>>> Revert "kconfig: do not override symbols already set"
>>> Revert "kconfig: fix randconfig tristate detection"
>>
>> I did the same, then applied all the kconfig commits once more and did a
>> git bisect with this script:
>>
>> #!/bin/sh
>>
>> cp config-bad .config
>> make silentoldconfig </dev/null
>>
>> This resulted in
>>
>> 7ded2624f8988bd22819a60a6000ba6b7091db89 is the first bad commit
>> commit 7ded2624f8988bd22819a60a6000ba6b7091db89
>> Author: Yann E. MORIN <yann.morin.1998@xxxxxxx>
>> Date: Sun Mar 10 16:34:10 2013 +0100
>>
>> kconfig: fix randomising choice entries in presence of KCONFIG_ALLCONFIG
>>
>> The commit id is different, because it is reverted and applied again. Yann?
>
> Commit 422c809 ("kconfig: fix randomising choice entries in presence of
> KCONFIG_ALLCONFIG") reverts cleanly and reverting it fixes the bug. So
> there is a plan B.
>

Thanks for your efforts!

- Sedat -

> Michal
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/