regulator: ab8500-ext: Strange set_mode behavior wheninfo->cfg->hwreq is set

From: Axel Lin
Date: Tue Apr 09 2013 - 11:01:36 EST


Hi,

I see below code && comments in enable() function:

/*
* To satisfy both HW high power request and SW request, the regulator
* must be on in high power.
*/
if (info->cfg && info->cfg->hwreq)
*regval = info->update_val_hp;


I'm not very clear about the comment and the code.

1) Does that mean the device does not allow set REGULATOR_MODE_IDLE when
info->cfg->hwreq is set?

current code looks strange because when info->cfg->hwreq is set:
set_mode() allows set REGULATOR_MODE_IDLE and get_mode() returns the status
is REGULATOR_MODE_IDLE. However, current code actually write info->update_val_hp
to the register (which means it is in REGULATOR_MODE_NORMAL mode).

If the device does not allow set REGULATOR_MODE_IDLE when info->cfg->hwreq is
set, we probably needs to return error in set REGULATOR_MODE_IDLE case.

Or 2) Does above comment mean the device needs set to REGULATOR_MODE_NORMAL
when the regulator is switching from off to on? Which means it allows setting
the regulator to REGULATOR_MODE_IDLE if the regulator is already on.

If this is the case, we cannot call enable() in set_mode() because current code
in set_mode() will write to register only when the regulator is already on.
Calling enable() always write info->update_val_hp to the register.
Thus it should just call abx500_mask_and_set_register_interruptible() directly
to update the register.

comments?

Regards,
Axel

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/