Re: [PATCH] locking: remove three unused Kconfig symbols

From: Ingo Molnar
Date: Mon Apr 08 2013 - 11:16:19 EST



* Paul Bolle <pebolle@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> The Kconfig symbols ARCH_INLINE_READ_UNLOCK_IRQ,
> ARCH_INLINE_SPIN_UNLOCK_IRQ, and ARCH_INLINE_WRITE_UNLOCK_IRQ were added
> in v2.6.33, but have never actually been used. It is safe to remove
> these.
>
> Signed-off-by: Paul Bolle <pebolle@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> Untested. These three symbols were added in commit
> 6beb000923882f6204ea2cfcd932e568e900803f ("locking: Make inlining
> decision Kconfig based").
>
> arch/s390/Kconfig | 3 ---
> kernel/Kconfig.locks | 10 ----------
> 2 files changed, 13 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/s390/Kconfig b/arch/s390/Kconfig
> index eb8fb62..8c544d2 100644
> --- a/arch/s390/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/s390/Kconfig
> @@ -70,7 +70,6 @@ config S390
> select ARCH_INLINE_READ_TRYLOCK
> select ARCH_INLINE_READ_UNLOCK
> select ARCH_INLINE_READ_UNLOCK_BH
> - select ARCH_INLINE_READ_UNLOCK_IRQ
> select ARCH_INLINE_READ_UNLOCK_IRQRESTORE
> select ARCH_INLINE_SPIN_LOCK
> select ARCH_INLINE_SPIN_LOCK_BH
> @@ -80,7 +79,6 @@ config S390
> select ARCH_INLINE_SPIN_TRYLOCK_BH
> select ARCH_INLINE_SPIN_UNLOCK
> select ARCH_INLINE_SPIN_UNLOCK_BH
> - select ARCH_INLINE_SPIN_UNLOCK_IRQ
> select ARCH_INLINE_SPIN_UNLOCK_IRQRESTORE
> select ARCH_INLINE_WRITE_LOCK
> select ARCH_INLINE_WRITE_LOCK_BH
> @@ -89,7 +87,6 @@ config S390
> select ARCH_INLINE_WRITE_TRYLOCK
> select ARCH_INLINE_WRITE_UNLOCK
> select ARCH_INLINE_WRITE_UNLOCK_BH
> - select ARCH_INLINE_WRITE_UNLOCK_IRQ
> select ARCH_INLINE_WRITE_UNLOCK_IRQRESTORE
> select ARCH_SAVE_PAGE_KEYS if HIBERNATION
> select ARCH_WANT_IPC_PARSE_VERSION
> diff --git a/kernel/Kconfig.locks b/kernel/Kconfig.locks
> index 44511d1..c438507 100644
> --- a/kernel/Kconfig.locks
> +++ b/kernel/Kconfig.locks
> @@ -25,9 +25,6 @@ config ARCH_INLINE_SPIN_UNLOCK
> config ARCH_INLINE_SPIN_UNLOCK_BH
> bool
>
> -config ARCH_INLINE_SPIN_UNLOCK_IRQ
> - bool
> -
> config ARCH_INLINE_SPIN_UNLOCK_IRQRESTORE
> bool
>
> @@ -53,13 +50,9 @@ config ARCH_INLINE_READ_UNLOCK
> config ARCH_INLINE_READ_UNLOCK_BH
> bool
>
> -config ARCH_INLINE_READ_UNLOCK_IRQ
> - bool
> -
> config ARCH_INLINE_READ_UNLOCK_IRQRESTORE
> bool
>
> -
> config ARCH_INLINE_WRITE_TRYLOCK
> bool
>
> @@ -81,9 +74,6 @@ config ARCH_INLINE_WRITE_UNLOCK
> config ARCH_INLINE_WRITE_UNLOCK_BH
> bool
>
> -config ARCH_INLINE_WRITE_UNLOCK_IRQ
> - bool
> -
> config ARCH_INLINE_WRITE_UNLOCK_IRQRESTORE
> bool

Erm, if you look at the code in question you'll see that they are unused I think
due to a bug:

config INLINE_READ_UNLOCK_IRQ
def_bool y
depends on !PREEMPT || ARCH_INLINE_READ_UNLOCK_BH

Shouldn't that depend on ARCH_INLINE_READ_UNLOCK_IRQ?

Similarly for the others.

Thanks,

Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/